Judge Says L.A. County Acted “Arbitrarily” When it Banned Outdoor Dining

Los Angeles County’s outdoor dining ban was an arbitrary decision conducted without proper ‘risk-benefit’ analysis, a Superior Court judge ruled last week. Once the state’s regional stay-at-home order expires — which won’t happen until at least Dec. 27 — the county will have to allow outdoor dining unless it conducts “an appropriate risk-benefit analysis."

Judge James Chalfant expressed surprise that the county did not conduct a study to assess outdoor dining risks prior to the ban. Any activity carries some risk of infection, including outdoor dining, but Chalfant noted CDC guidelines call the risk of outdoor activities moderate to minimal.

Los Angeles County implemented the ban on outdoor dining on Nov. 25, affecting some 30,000 establishments. The California Restaurant Association sued.

Read more about the latest ruling at Fox11 News.

See also: The judge who ruled in favor of outdoor dining was wrong. Here’s why.

Some L.A. County Cities Want Their Own Health Departments

Anger, Heartbreak After L.A. County's Outdoor Dining Ban


Comments

Top Stories

Thursday, June 17, 2021 - 05:11

The recall effort against Gavin Newsom is being watched across the nation. But California's governor isn’t the only one whose job is potentially on the line.

Rev & Tax

Thursday, June 17, 2021 - 05:22

Cities like Fresno and Ontario have been courting online retail giants with generous sales-tax rebate programs that return as much as 50 to 80% of the tax to the retailers.